ai-trend-notifierKO

$ diff kimi-k3 longcat-2-0

Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.0

Values come from Kimi K3 and LongCat-2.0, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Input price
LongCat-2.0 at $0.3/M against $3/M — 10.0× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
LongCat-2.0 at $1.2/M against $15/M — 12.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Weights
Both publish weights — Kimi K3 under Modified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable), LongCat-2.0 under MIT (commercially permissive). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
Kimi K3 shipped 16 days after LongCat-2.0 (2026-07-16 vs 2026-06-30).

Full spec

AttributeKimi K3LongCat-2.0
DeveloperMoonshot AIMeituan
Released2026-07-162026-06-30
Context window1M tokens1 million tokens (LongCat Sparse Attention / LSA)
Pricing$0.30/M cache-hit input · $3.00/M cache-miss input · $15.00/M output$0.30/M input · $1.20/M output ($0.006/M cached input) — OpenRouter catalogue, read 2026-07-28. Open weights, so this is hosted-inference pricing rather than a licence fee.
LicenseModified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable)MIT (commercially permissive)
AvailabilityKimi Code, Kimi app, Kimi API; weights on Hugging Face (`moonshot-ai/kimi-k3`, released 2026-07-27)Open-sourced 2026-06-30; previously served on OpenRouter under the codename "Owl Alpha"

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons