ai-trend-notifier

$ diff grok-4-5 muse-spark

Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark

xAI and Meta AI, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Muse Spark takes 1M against 500K — 2× more room in a single request.
Input price
Muse Spark at $1.25/M against $2/M — 1.6× cheaper to feed.
Output price
Muse Spark at $4.25/M against $6/M — 1.4× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Grok 4.5 shipped 92 days after Muse Spark (2026-07-09 vs 2026-04-08).

Full spec

AttributeGrok 4.5Muse Spark
DeveloperxAIMeta AI
Released2026-07-092026-04-08
Context window500K tokens1,000,000 tokens (1.1)
Pricing$2/M input · $6/M output$1.25/M input · $4.25/M output (Meta Model API, public preview)
Licensenot recordedproprietary (closed / API-only, not open-weights)
AvailabilityGrok Build (default model), Cursor (all plans), SpaceXAI console/API; not in EU (regulatory review pending as of 2026-07-09)Meta Model API (public preview, US-based developers only)

Values come from Grok 4.5 and Muse Spark, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons