ai-trend-notifier

$ diff kimi-k3 grok-4-5

Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5

Moonshot AI and xAI, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Kimi K3 takes 1M against 500K — 2× more room in a single request.
Input price
Grok 4.5 at $2/M against $3/M — 1.5× cheaper to feed. Standard rates: one of these labs also quotes a lower cached-input tier, which applies only when a prefix is reused — see the full spec below.
Output price
Grok 4.5 at $6/M against $15/M — 2.5× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Kimi K3 shipped 7 days after Grok 4.5 (2026-07-16 vs 2026-07-09).

Full spec

AttributeKimi K3Grok 4.5
DeveloperMoonshot AIxAI
Released2026-07-162026-07-09
Context window1M tokens500K tokens
Pricing$0.30/M cache-hit input · $3.00/M cache-miss input · $15.00/M output$2/M input · $6/M output
LicenseModified MIT (commercial use permitted; weights publicly downloadable)not recorded
AvailabilityKimi Code, Kimi app, Kimi API; weights on Hugging Face (`moonshot-ai/kimi-k3`, released 2026-07-27)Grok Build (default model), Cursor (all plans), SpaceXAI console/API; not in EU (regulatory review pending as of 2026-07-09)

Values come from Kimi K3 and Grok 4.5, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons