AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff inkling glm-5-2

Inkling vs GLM-5.2

Values come from Inkling and GLM-5.2, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Weights
Both publish weights — Inkling under Apache 2.0 (open-weight), GLM-5.2 under MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits"). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
Inkling shipped 32 days after GLM-5.2 (2026-07-15 vs 2026-06-13).

Full spec

AttributeInklingGLM-5.2
DeveloperThinking MachinesZ.ai
Released2026-07-152026-06-13
Context window1M1,000,000 tokens
Pricingnot recorded$1.40/M input · $4.40/M output — Z.ai's own endpoint on the OpenRouter catalogue, read 2026-08-01. Earlier revisions of this row quoted ≈$0.62–$0.77, which was not a price change: OpenRouter serves this model from 33 providers between $0.72 and $2.31 on input, and `/models` reports whichever one is routing at that instant. Four alerts in a day named $0.97, $1.19, $1.12 and $0.76 — Alibaba, SiliconFlow, an intermediate route, and StreamLake. Reseller quotes are real prices but they are not this model's price; quote the first-party figure, or quote a reseller with its name attached.
LicenseApache 2.0 (open-weight)MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits")
AvailabilityHugging Face (BF16 and NVFP4), Tinker (fine-tuning), SGLang, vLLM, llama.cpp, UnslothGLM Coding Plan (highest subscription tier), standalone API, open weights, NVIDIA NIM hosted

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons