ai-trend-notifier

$ diff gemini-3-6-flash gemini-3-5-flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google DeepMind and Google DeepMind, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1.0M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Output price
Gemini 3.6 Flash at $7.5/M against $9/M — 1.2× cheaper to generate. Output dominates the bill on most agentic workloads, where the model writes far more than it reads.
Recency
Gemini 3.6 Flash shipped 63 days after Gemini 3.5 Flash (2026-07-21 vs 2026-05-19).

Full spec

AttributeGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindGoogle DeepMind
Released2026-07-212026-05-19
Context window1,048,576 tokens (1M)1,048,576 input / 65,536 output tokens
Pricing$1.50/M input · $7.50/M output$1.50 in / $9.00 out per 1M tokens ($0.15 cached)
Licenseproprietaryproprietary (API-only; no weight release)
AvailabilityGemini API, Google AI Studio, Android Studio, Vertex AI, consumer Gemini app, Google Search, GitHub CopilotGemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, Gemini app, AI Mode in Google Search

Values come from Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons