ai-trend-notifier

$ diff deepseek-v4 glm-5-2

DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.2

DeepSeek and Z.ai, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Weights
Both publish weights — DeepSeek V4 under MIT (open-weight), GLM-5.2 under MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits"). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
DeepSeek V4 shipped 33 days after GLM-5.2 (2026-07-16 vs 2026-06-13).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4GLM-5.2
DeveloperDeepSeekZ.ai
Released2026-07-162026-06-13
Context window1M tokens (384K max output)1,000,000 tokens
PricingPeak: 2× off-peak API rates; off-peak rates not disclosednot publicly listed as of 2026-07-13 (~1/6th GPT-5.5 API cost per VentureBeat)
LicenseMIT (open-weight)MIT (unrestricted, "no regional limits")
AvailabilityDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro)GLM Coding Plan (highest subscription tier), standalone API, open weights, NVIDIA NIM hosted

Values come from DeepSeek V4 and GLM-5.2, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons