ai-trend-notifier

$ diff gemini-3-6-flash deepseek-v4

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4

Google DeepMind and DeepSeek, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Gemini 3.6 Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Weights
DeepSeek V4 publishes weights (MIT (open-weight)); Gemini 3.6 Flash is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
Gemini 3.6 Flash shipped 5 days after DeepSeek V4 (2026-07-21 vs 2026-07-16).

Full spec

AttributeGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V4
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindDeepSeek
Released2026-07-212026-07-16
Context window1,048,576 tokens (1M)1M tokens (384K max output)
Pricing$1.50/M input · $7.50/M outputPeak: 2× off-peak API rates; off-peak rates not disclosed
LicenseproprietaryMIT (open-weight)
AvailabilityGemini API, Google AI Studio, Android Studio, Vertex AI, consumer Gemini app, Google Search, GitHub CopilotDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro)

Values come from Gemini 3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons