ai-trend-notifier

$ diff deepseek-v4 gemini-3-5-flash

DeepSeek V4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

DeepSeek and Google DeepMind, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Weights
DeepSeek V4 publishes weights (MIT (open-weight)); Gemini 3.5 Flash is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
DeepSeek V4 shipped 58 days after Gemini 3.5 Flash (2026-07-16 vs 2026-05-19).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4Gemini 3.5 Flash
DeveloperDeepSeekGoogle DeepMind
Released2026-07-162026-05-19
Context window1M tokens (384K max output)1,048,576 input / 65,536 output tokens
PricingPeak: 2× off-peak API rates; off-peak rates not disclosed$1.50 in / $9.00 out per 1M tokens ($0.15 cached)
LicenseMIT (open-weight)proprietary (API-only; no weight release)
AvailabilityDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro)Gemini API, Google AI Studio, Google Antigravity, Gemini app, AI Mode in Google Search

Values come from DeepSeek V4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons