AI Trend Notifier
EN

$ diff deepseek-v4-flash laguna-s-2-1

DeepSeek V4-Flash vs Laguna S 2.1

Values come from DeepSeek V4-Flash and Laguna S 2.1, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing.

What actually differs

Context window
DeepSeek V4-Flash takes 1.0M against 1M — modestly more room in a single request.
Weights
Both publish weights — DeepSeek V4-Flash under MIT (open-weight), Laguna S 2.1 under OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight). Check the licences rather than assuming they permit the same commercial use.
Recency
DeepSeek V4-Flash shipped 10 days after Laguna S 2.1 (2026-07-31 vs 2026-07-21).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4-FlashLaguna S 2.1
DeveloperDeepSeekPoolside
Released2026-07-312026-07-21
Context window1,048,576 (1M) — OpenRouter catalogue `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`, read 2026-08-01; DeepSeek's own launch material did not state it1M
Pricing$0.14/M input (cache miss) · $0.0028/M input (cache hit) · $0.28/M output — see Conflicting Reportsnot recorded
LicenseMIT (open-weight)OpenMDW-1.1 (open-weight)
AvailabilityDeepSeek API (Responses format, Codex-adapted), Hugging Face (`deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731`)Hugging Face

How these pages are produced

← all comparisons