ai-trend-notifier

$ diff deepseek-v4 claude-opus-4-8

DeepSeek V4 vs Claude Opus 4.8

DeepSeek and Anthropic, side by side. Every value below is the one recorded on the model’s own wiki page, with its citation — nothing is estimated.

What actually differs

Context window
Identical — both accept 1M tokens, so context length is not a reason to pick either.
Weights
DeepSeek V4 publishes weights (MIT (open-weight)); Claude Opus 4.8 is API-only. That decides self-hosting, air-gapped deployment and fine-tuning before any capability question does.
Recency
DeepSeek V4 shipped 49 days after Claude Opus 4.8 (2026-07-16 vs 2026-05-28).

Full spec

AttributeDeepSeek V4Claude Opus 4.8
DeveloperDeepSeekAnthropic
Released2026-07-162026-05-28
Context window1M tokens (384K max output)1M tokens
PricingPeak: 2× off-peak API rates; off-peak rates not disclosed$5/M input · $25/M output
LicenseMIT (open-weight)proprietary (API-only; no weight release)
AvailabilityDeepSeek API, Hugging Face (deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro)Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Vertex AI

Values come from DeepSeek V4 and Claude Opus 4.8, where each is cited to its source. This page states no benchmark result and ranks neither model — it puts two published specifications next to each other. Where a lab has not published a figure, the row says so rather than guessing. How these pages are produced.

← all comparisons